CDE project 1 sec­tion 4: com­mu­ni­cate val­ues, and do it consistently.

Written by
The Commission on the Donor Experience
Added
April 28, 2017

Enhancing the ways we use language

CDE Project 1: The use and misuse of language

Andrea Macrae and Chris Washington Sare, April 2017

Reviewed by Matthew Sherrington

4. Communicate values, and do it consistently.

The degree to which a brand shares the values of its consumers is a significant determiner of customer loyalty and satisfaction. [1] Exactly the same dynamic has been found between charities and their supporters. [2] Evidence suggests that a supporter will feel more positively towards a charity, and feel more satisfied by its communications, if the charity and the supporter share some values. [3]

Of course, in order for a supporter to be able to recognise a charity as having shared values, the charity must have and express some values in the first place. A study by Sargeant and Woodliffe found that “the extent to which individuals believe that they have deepened their knowledge of the organisation thought the communications they receive” will “impact positively” on the individual’s relationship with the organisation. [4] The Relationship Fundraising review proposes that supporters’ trust in and loyalty to a charity “may be enhanced by […] making it clear what values the organisation espouses, […] communicating not only the content of service provision to beneficiaries, but also the style, manner or ethos underpinning that delivery.” [5] This suggests that supporters will feel more positively towards a charity, and feel more satisfied by its communications, if the charity clearly communicates its values, ethos and identity. This may in part be because this allows charities to better manage, and therefore better meet, supporters’ expectations. [6]



[1] See, for example, Jamal, A., & Goode, M. M. H. (2001), ‘Consumer and brands: A study of the impact of self-image congruence on brand preference and satisfaction’. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, vol. 19, pp. 482-492; Sirgy M. J., Grewal, D., Mangleburg, T. F., Park, J., Chon, K., Claiborne, C. B., & Berkman, H. (1997), ‘Assessing the predictive validity of two methods of measuring self-image congruence’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 25, pp. 229-241; Sirgy, M. J., Johar, J., Samli, A., & Claiborne, C. B. (1991), ‘Self-congruity versus functional congruity: Predictors of consumer behavior’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 19, pp. 363-375.

[2] Bennett, R. (2009), ‘Factors influencing donation switching behaviour among charity supporters: An empirical investigation’, Journal of Customer Behaviour, vol. 8, issue 4, pp. 329-345; MacMillan, K., Money, K., Money, A. and Downing, S. (2005), ‘Relationship marketing in the not-for-profit sector: An extension and application of the commitment-trust theory’, Journal of Business Research, vol. 58, pp. 806-818; Sargeant, A. and Woodliffe, L. (2007), ‘Building donor loyalty: The antecedents and tole of commitment in the context of charity giving’, Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, vol. 18, issue 2, pp.47-68.

[3] Hibbert, S. (2016), ‘Charity communications: Shaping donor perceptions and giving’, in The Routledge Companion to Philanthropy, eds T. Jung, S. D. Phillips, and J. Harrow (London, Routledge), pp.102-115.

[4] Sargeant and Woodliffe study referenced in footnote 18 above, this conclusion from the study being summarised in Sargeant, A. (2016), Relationship fundraising: Where do we go from here? Vol. 1, Plymouth: Centre for Sustainable Philanthropy, Plymouth University. pp. 21-22.

[5] Sargeant, A. (2016), Relationship fundraising: Where do we go from here? Vol. 1, Plymouth: Centre for Sustainable Philanthropy, Plymouth University, p. 20.

[6] nfpSynergy’s ‘Brand Awareness Monitor’ reveals the level of public familiarity with a charity’s organisational identity, and can indicate the relative strength of that organisational identity in shaping public perceptions of the charity (in comparison to other factors, such as transitory media stories).

Click on the image below to see Project 1 summary only - PDF format

Click on the image below to see Project 1 in full - PDF format

About the author: The Commission on the Donor Experience

The CDE has one simple ideal – to place donors at the heart of fundraising. The aim of the CDE is to support the transformation of fundraising, to change the culture to a truly consistent donor-based approach to raising money. It is based on evidence drawn from first hand insight of best practice. By identifying best practice and capturing examples, we will enable these to be shared and brought into common use.

Related case studies or articles

CDE project 1 summary: the use and misuse of language

This project will share good practices plus examples of common misuses to help fundraisers use language appropriately so they can swiftly yet significantly improve the donor experience.

Read more

CDE project 1 section 1: rethink language to reflect, respect and engage with the views and feelings of supporters

So often people in business inadvertently use language inappropriately, whether as insider speak, jargon, acronyms or just with insufficient thought, consideration or respect. This project will share good practices plus examples of common misuses to help fundraisers use language appropriately so they can swiftly yet significantly improve the donor experience.

Read more

CDE project 1 section 2: talk less about the charity and more about the cause, the work, the beneficiaries and the supporters

Named, and ideally pictured, people who are most directly involved in delivering solutions to beneficiaries show the ‘human face’ of the work of the charity and provide readers with an identifiable connection.

Read more