CDE project 1 sec­tion 7: invite feed­back and turn it into dialogue.

Written by
The Commission on the Donor Experience
Added
April 25, 2017

Enhancing the ways we use language

Andrea Macrae and Chris Washington Sare, April 2017

Reviewed by Matthew Sherrington

7. Invite feedback and turn it into dialogue.

The views of supporters are invaluable to charities, and yet most charity communications are still one-way. Often, the only form of response a charity seems interested in is a direct debit. Feedback, though, offers precious insights into supporters’ personal views and ideas, and is crucial to the development of a relationship and a sense of connection. [1] Fostering dialogue also helps to create a sense of collaborative teamwork in tackling the cause, reduce a sense of ‘them’ and ‘us’, and develop a sense of identification between the supporter and the charity. Feedback and dialogue, though, first requires an explicit, appealing invitation and a simple way for supporters to offer their thoughts.

Social media has created new contexts for dialogue and direct response. Daniel Newman writes in Forbes magazine that social media is the new primary tool through which organisations should “focus on engaging your audience; asking them for their opinions, comments, and ideas on how you could make things better for them. [… On] social media platforms, the main focus should be on listening to the customer." [2]

This listening should extend beyond social media though. Whatever your medium, every communication is an opportunity to engage supporters – to explicitly ask for their input and their opinions.  A dedicated space for input demonstrates the charity’s real interest in supporters’ views. The invitation also encourages supporters to reflection on their own opinions, raising supporters’ conscious awareness of their feelings about the cause and organisation. Each of these elements of the invitation for feedback powerfully enhances supporter satisfaction.

[1] Newman, D. (2016), ‘Social media is no longer a marketing channel, it’s a customer experience channel’, Forbes, http://www.forbes.com/sites/da...

[2] MacQuillin, I. Sargeant, A. & Shang, J. (2016), Relationship fundraising: Where do we go from here? Vol. 2 – Review of theory from social psychology. Plymouth: Centre for Sustainable Philanthropy, Plymouth University, p. 20; Hibbert, S. (2016), ‘Charity communications: Shaping donor perceptions and giving’, in The Routledge Companion to Philanthropy, eds T. Jung, S. D. Phillips, & J. Harrow (London, Routledge), pp. 102-115: p. 110.

Talking with, rather than just at, supporters, though, is only achieved through genuine dialogue – through listening, acknowledging and responding to supporters’ input. Take up supporters’ topics, talk about the things that interest them, and reflect back the language they use and the values they express. This reinforces the connection between a charity and its supporters and creates a deeper exchange.


A strategy for a) explicitly inviting feedback, b) processing feedback, and also c) acting on feedback, and d) turning feedback into dialogue, is crucial for authentic, two-way communications. Real dialogue requires careful resourcing and management, but the rewards for supporters, charities and the sector as a whole can be significant.

Click on the image below to see Project 1 summary only - PDF format

Click on the image below to see Project 1 in full - PDF format

About the author: The Commission on the Donor Experience

The CDE has one simple ideal – to place donors at the heart of fundraising. The aim of the CDE is to support the transformation of fundraising, to change the culture to a truly consistent donor-based approach to raising money. It is based on evidence drawn from first hand insight of best practice. By identifying best practice and capturing examples, we will enable these to be shared and brought into common use.

Related case studies or articles

CDE project 1 summary: the use and misuse of language

This project will share good practices plus examples of common misuses to help fundraisers use language appropriately so they can swiftly yet significantly improve the donor experience.

Read more

CDE project 1 section 6: use inclusive, accessible language and avoid jargon.

Part six of CDE's series on good practices plus examples of common misuses to help fundraisers use language appropriately so they can swiftly yet significantly improve the donor experience.

Read more

CDE project 1 section 1: rethink language to reflect, respect and engage with the views and feelings of supporters

So often people in business inadvertently use language inappropriately, whether as insider speak, jargon, acronyms or just with insufficient thought, consideration or respect. This project will share good practices plus examples of common misuses to help fundraisers use language appropriately so they can swiftly yet significantly improve the donor experience.

Read more

CDE project 1 section 5: subvert expectations.

Part five of CDE's series on good practices plus examples of common misuses to help fundraisers use language appropriately so they can swiftly yet significantly improve the donor experience.

Read more

CDE project 1 section 4: communicate values, and do it consistently.

Part four of CDE's series on good practices plus examples of common misuses to help fundraisers use language appropriately so they can swiftly yet significantly improve the donor experience

Read more

CDE project 1 section 2: talk less about the charity and more about the cause, the work, the beneficiaries and the supporters

Named, and ideally pictured, people who are most directly involved in delivering solutions to beneficiaries show the ‘human face’ of the work of the charity and provide readers with an identifiable connection.

Read more