CDE project 1 sec­tion 9: test your com­mu­ni­ca­tions to find out what works best for your char­i­ty and your supporters. 

Written by
The Commission on the Donor Experience
Added
April 23, 2017

Enhancing the ways we use language

CDE Project 1: The use and misuse of language

Andrea Macrae and Chris Washington Sare, April 2017

Reviewed by Matthew Sherrington

9. Test your communications to find out what works best for your charity and your supporters.

Banners, logos, photos and inserts are tested with rigour across the sector. Some aspects of language use are tested too, but often only key propositions, email subject lines and the like. A lot of beliefs about charity copy writing have been inherited over the years, filtered down from practices which might not really fit your specific charity or work with the kinds of communication channels you use. It is worth checking and challenging some of these inherited assumptions about language and communications, and finding out how relevant and valid they are for your charity. There are lots of simple ways to test communications copy which can really improve understanding of what works for your supporters and what does not.

Lots of charities test new copy against a ‘control’ text – one which has worked well before. Testing one email against a control email and finding the former out-performs the latter, in terms of responses generated, does tell us that one email is better than the other, but it doesn’t tell us why. It doesn’t reveal the particular strengths of one email over another, because it doesn’t identify which features actually make it work. Looking at some of the features which differ in the two versions, or exploring responses in a bit more detail with focus groups, will give us some clues. This is a great first step in testing, but you can go further. On the basis of those clues, you can develop more nuanced versions of the email, isolating and varying particular features in a controlled way. These versions are worth testing with a second round of focus groups. This will give you insights so much richer than the first stage of testing – insights which you can draw on again and again in the future.

Comparing the effectiveness of versions in which features like these are varied will show you how you can make language work best for your message and your cause. These tests are immeasurably more valuable than simply testing one version against a control text. The kinds of insights these tests give you, about subtle but crucial differences in effectiveness, can reveal many ways of enhancing current and future communications exponentially. Going beyond the ‘control copy vs. version b’ lets you find out what really works best in your charity and for your supporters.

Click on the image below to see Project 1 summary only - PDF format

Click on the image below to see Project 1 in full - PDF format

About the author: The Commission on the Donor Experience

The CDE has one simple ideal – to place donors at the heart of fundraising. The aim of the CDE is to support the transformation of fundraising, to change the culture to a truly consistent donor-based approach to raising money. It is based on evidence drawn from first hand insight of best practice. By identifying best practice and capturing examples, we will enable these to be shared and brought into common use.

Related case studies or articles

CDE project 1 summary: the use and misuse of language

This project will share good practices plus examples of common misuses to help fundraisers use language appropriately so they can swiftly yet significantly improve the donor experience.

Read more

CDE project 1 section 6: use inclusive, accessible language and avoid jargon.

Part six of CDE's series on good practices plus examples of common misuses to help fundraisers use language appropriately so they can swiftly yet significantly improve the donor experience.

Read more

CDE project 1 section 1: rethink language to reflect, respect and engage with the views and feelings of supporters

So often people in business inadvertently use language inappropriately, whether as insider speak, jargon, acronyms or just with insufficient thought, consideration or respect. This project will share good practices plus examples of common misuses to help fundraisers use language appropriately so they can swiftly yet significantly improve the donor experience.

Read more

CDE project 1 section 5: subvert expectations.

Part five of CDE's series on good practices plus examples of common misuses to help fundraisers use language appropriately so they can swiftly yet significantly improve the donor experience.

Read more

CDE project 1 section 7: invite feedback and turn it into dialogue.

Part seven of CDE's series on good practices plus examples of common misuses to help fundraisers use language appropriately so they can swiftly yet significantly improve the donor experience

Read more

CDE project 1 section 8: make contact permissions options work for supporters.

Part eight of CDE's series on good practices plus examples of common misuses to help fundraisers use language appropriately so they can swiftly yet significantly improve the donor experience

Read more

CDE project 1 section 4: communicate values, and do it consistently.

Part four of CDE's series on good practices plus examples of common misuses to help fundraisers use language appropriately so they can swiftly yet significantly improve the donor experience

Read more

CDE project 1 section 2: talk less about the charity and more about the cause, the work, the beneficiaries and the supporters

Named, and ideally pictured, people who are most directly involved in delivering solutions to beneficiaries show the ‘human face’ of the work of the charity and provide readers with an identifiable connection.

Read more