Com­mit­ment. And why it mat­ters more than any­thing for fundraisers

Written by
Ken Burnett
June 02, 2012

An older, experienced fundraiser was showing a new, fresh and eager young fundraiser the ropes.

‘To succeed at fundraising my boy,’ the older fundraiser said with gravitas as they strolled around the donor service department, ‘you have to be committed. Mere involvement is not enough. If you want to make something of this career you have chosen, you must be committed.’

The young tyro was puzzled. ‘But, what’s the difference, old-timer? Surely involvement and commitment are pretty much the same thing?’

The voice of experience responded with conviction. ‘Ah ha! Not the same thing at all, young fellow, not at all. To understand the difference between commitment and mere involvement you have to understand the difference between bacon and eggs.'

‘Bacon and eggs?’ cried the perplexed youth.

‘Yes’, retorted the sage. ‘Bacon and eggs. In bacon and eggs, the hen is involved. But the pig is committed.’

There can have been no more useless argument among fundraisers over the past two decades than the one about whether or not we should be building mutually beneficial relationships with our donors or merely mailing, telephoning and otherwise soliciting them ‘til they bleed’. This latter paradigm, the ‘churn and burn’ school of fundraising, never had even the stump of a leg to stand on in the face of logic, experience and all that donors tell us. Nevertheless, it is the paradigm that holds sway in most fundraising organisations to this day.

Our short-sightedness as a sector is as baffling as it is persistent.

Perhaps the paradigm persists because no one, so far, has come along and shown us, convincingly, just how much our snatch-and-grab philosophy is costing us.

Thankfully, this seems set to change. For along have come seasoned fundraiser, campaigner and Agitator Roger Craver and his compadre Kevin Schulman, who’s something of a wizard with data. Together this pair has developed a model for calculating the commitment of your donors and, from this, a way of ascribing to each of your donors a commitment score.

Someone should. So far, so good, but there’s more.

They’ve also worked out the average annual difference in income to you from a committed donor over one with no sense of loyalty (a whopping 131 per cent more, since you ask, there’s big money at stake here). And they’ve worked out the key factor that influences retention. They’ve sensibly linked acquisition and retention (many fundraisers focus everything on the former while foolishly neglecting the latter).

In short, Roger and Kevin have treated donor relationship development to the rigorous assessment that its massive importance deserves. For this, they deserve our gratitude. Only a fool will ignore their findings (OK, I’m getting old. I haven’t got time to pussyfoot around on this issue any longer. Nothing costs our fine voluntary sector and all the good works it does more than fundraisers’ neglect of donor relationship development. I no longer care who I insult in getting that point across.)

Is this kind of thing likely to be of value for the serious fundraiser? You bet. It’s worth at least Roger and Kevin’s combined weight in precious metal. It’s not the first such effort of course and it won’t be the last. But it’s a sophisticated step forward and it does show, convincingly, why any fundraiser today would be simply certifiable to fail to understand and act upon these findings.

Rather than comment in detail on their analysis SOFII has sought their permission to make the executive summary of the first DonorVoice commitment report available for you to download here.

This, therefore, is a DonorVoice report, prepared by them (and so, of course, not subject to the rigours of SOFII’s editorial processes and ultimate conversion from the original American into ‘English’ English). It is no less valuable as a result. I’ve not checked their methodology and cannot comment on the robustness of their maths – that I leave to others more numerate than I. But the overall validity of their conclusions is unarguable. For example, take the claim, ‘For every 1,000 donors moved from low to high commitment, expect $200,000 in increased revenue’. Though DonorVoice asserts that it can validate the figure, I can’t. But it sounds about right. And for sure, it’s a lot of money, more than enough to be worth doing something about.

What matters most here though is the conclusion that commitment is the big thing. That and the ability to compare commitment levels of individual donors, groups of donors and entire donor files of organisations, and to rank them consistently. To have a ‘top 50’ of nonprofits ranked by the commitment of their donors is a breakthrough. You now know what to do to nudge your nonprofit up that list. To be able to delve into your organisation’s donor files and identify where you’re doing well and where you’re falling short, well, that strikes me as near priceless information that should underpin everything for you and your fundraising colleagues.

Particularly I recommend the seven key drivers of donor commitment and the ideas banks that accompany them. To anyone who thinks all this is mere common sense, reflect please on the fact that common sense remains very rare in our sector, and elsewhere too. If you would steal a march on your competitors all you have to do is to put these ideas into practice now.

Nothing will more quickly and more surely get you ahead of the game. For most of your competitors haven’t cottoned on to this common sense yet.

Roger Craver can be contacted c/o the Agitator (

Kevin Schulman at DonorVoice will answer any specific questions, provide information on downloads, the maths, white papers, etc.

The first DonorVoice webinar on this subject was recorded and SOFII users can link to it here.

© Ken Burnett 2011. These views are the opinions of the author rather than specifically SOFII’s.

About the author: Ken Burnett

Ken Burnett

Ken Burnett is author of Relationship Fundraising and other books including The Zen of Fundraising, (Jossey-Bass Inc, San Francisco, USA). The Tiny Essentials of an Effective Volunteer Board and Storytelling can change the world, both published by The White Lion Press, UK

In 2021, he wrote and published a book about campaigning fundraising, The essence of Campaigning Fundraising in 52 exhibits and 199 web links.

Ken co-founded SOFII with his late wife Marie and served as a trustee before retiring from the SOFII board in 2022.

Related case studies or articles

Ken Burnett’s two great stories.

Here are two grainy, shaky but very inspiring stories; Gabriella’s new feet and The worst tourist in the world.

Read more

Integrity is not something you show others, it’s how you behave behind their back

Ken Burnett, SOFII’s founder, looks at questions of integrity in fundraising and where it’s lacking, asking the question ‘Whatever has happened to plain ol’ knowing "right" from "wrong"?’

Read more

The emotional brain

Seasoned fundraiser Ken Burnett says of his latest article, The Emotional Brain, ‘It seems to me that fundraisers don’t know as much as they might about what it is that makes people give and why; what makes them loyal or repeat donors and what binds them to our cause above other causes, come what may. So I’m fairly sure that the emotional brain is the most important subject I’ve written about in a long time. Working on it has quite altered my view of what, as fundraisers, we should be doing when we acquire and then communicate with our donors.’

Read more

This is for YOU: an urgent appeal from Ken Burnett, founder of SOFII

​It’s about SOFII and about you, but to explain properly, I need to start further back with why SOFII exists in the first place.

Read more

Notes from Ken Burnett following his review of the document ‘Current Situation and Tendency of Internet Fundraising in China’.

This summary from the report shows that on-line digital fundraising has already made great progress in China recently and is likely to show even more potential for growth in the very near future. But, while there is good cause for optimism, some lessons have been learned and it is clear that Chinese fundraisers can gain even more, if they learn to do Internet fundraising right. 

Read more

Fundraising in a time of crisis: could this be fundraising’s finest hour?

We’ve seen quarantined Italians serenading each other from their balconies - what can fundraisers learn from such solidarity? Ken Burnett explains all.

Read more

CDE project 6 section 4.5c: The Dóchas code of conduct on images and messages.

As part of CDE project 6 on the use and misuse of emotion, Ken Burnett explains what the Dóchas code of conduct on images and messages is and why it is necessary for our organisations.

Read more

CDE project 6. Section 5.4b: the moody leader

In an extract from his book Storytelling can change the world, Ken Burnett looks at moody leaders from history and explores how emotion can play a part in strong leadership. 

Read more

中国网络筹款的现状和趋势 ——Ken Burnett点评《2014中国网络捐赠第三方平台研究报告》


Read more

The gold standard in fundraising, part 2: exceeding expectations.

Final part of a conversation about transformational fundraising that Giles Pegram and Redmond Mullin had recently with SOFII’s Ken Burnett.

Read more

ActionAid’s journey to diversity

How one of the UK’s leading INGOs improved performance from management, staff and board by putting its principles into practice. And found happiness in the process.

Read more

How to grow income rapidly, at a reasonable cost, retaining donor loyalty along the way

In Relationship Fundraising, the classic read for all fundraisers, Ken Burnett takes us carefully through the fundamentals of good fundraising. Ken reminds us that a unique relationship exists between donors and the causes they support, and shows us how to preserve and develop that relationship.

Review by Neil Sloggie.

Read more

An earlier incarnation of NSPCC’s The Children’s Friend

Managing trustee, Ken Burnett, shares with SOFII readers how the idea for the original NSPCC supporter magazine The Children’s Friend was born. In this revealing article, Ken gives us a glimpse into how NSPCC’s most significant donor communication was developed and how it became something of a family affair – SOFII’s not just thrown together you know!

Read more

Communication and the English language

Ken Burnett tackles bad use of the English language in fundraising and explains why getting this crucial matter right can make all the difference.

Read more

World-changers at Work presents: a life-stage fairytale - how Beryl and Clive found the meaning of life.

In an excerpt of his Storytelling can change the world book recreated for World-changers at Work, Ken Burnett asks how fundraisers can help people find meaning in their life to make a difference to the world. The answer? Tell great stories.

Read more

The Olive Cooke story

How the tragic case of Olive Cooke impacted the fundraising sector and led to radical change.

Read more

SOFII’s small charity showcase

The Foundation for Social Improvement (FSI) helps small charities by sharing knowledge, expertise and experience. Upwards of 1,500 charities are helped each year, not one of them with a turnover above £1.5 million and most raising considerably less. SOFII believes we should celebrate small charities more than we do so, together with FSI, has started this showcase with the aim of levelling the playing field, or even to get the ground sloping just a little in the small charity’s direction.

Read more

Also in Categories