Mak­ing can­cer cute

The ad agency has struck again with this strik­ing­ly stu­pid non­prof­it ad.

Written by
Jeff Brooks
Added
May 14, 2014

The victim: Movember (the organisation that challenges men to change their appearance and the face of men’s health by growing a moustache in November). The offending agency: the slash-challenged TBWA\Chiat|Day.

Now I can see the power in giving people the opportunity to beat up a terrible disease; there are certainly a couple of diseases that I wish I could kick to pieces. But when you symbolise that by making the kickers look like homophobic thugs and the disease look like a cute team mascot, well, you’ve turned the concept upside do

I actually wonder if the creators of this advert even watched it. Didn’t anyone raise their hand and say ‘Umm…it looks like we’re kicking Mickey Mouse’s butt’. Of course not. The ad agency geniuses were wrapped in their usual world of abstraction. In all their creativity, they missed the central fact that prostate cancer is a terrible thing. It’s not a cute and goofy costume. It is a real life disease that hurts and can be fatal.

If you want to move people to fight prostate cancer show them there is a problem, make that problem real and give them a meaningful action they can take. Finally show how their actions will help to make progress against the disease.

Abstract symbolism doesn’t achieve any of that.

Shockingly, this video was not the only offending ad for this campaign. 


Really? Prostate cancer is picking up prostitutes? That’s what has our thug-protagonists all worked up?

I am amazed at how this ad agency has worked for this charity. They started off badly with a pointless, dumb and misdirected abstract concept. And then they managed to get surreally worse.

So remember the standard warning for when an ad agency comes up with a clever, conceptual and intangible idea to represent your cause: just say no!

About the author: Jeff Brooks

Jeff Brooks has served the nonprofit community for more than 30 years, working as a writer and creative director on behalf of a variety of organisations including CARE, World Vision, Feeding America, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, National Wildlife Federation, and many more. He blogs at Future Fundraising Now and Moceanic. In previous careers, he’s been an English teacher and a classical musician. He lives in Seattle in the USA.

Recent Articles

Can fundraisers tell the difference between AI and human-written thank you letters?

Surprising survey results show that AI letters were rated higher by fundraisers than human-written letters. 

Read more

A medida que los donantes jóvenes empiezan a participar más, ¿están las organizaciones preparadas para ellos?

Las personas jóvenes están listas para apoyar a las organizaciones, pero la forma en la que te comunicas con ellas puede marcar una gran diferencia en que elijan o no tu causa. En este artículo, Anjali Bewtra de Blue State, comparte qué tomar en cuenta al comunicarse con este público, junto con ejemplos de entidades que ya lo están haciendo bien.

Read more

Gigging for a good cause – War Child’s BRITs Week fundraising

Oscar Lester looks at charity concerts and celebrates one of the best – War Child’s annual collaboration with the BRIT Awards. He explains how BRITs Week leverages the timeless appeal of live music, and generates thousands of pounds every year for children impacted by war and conflict

Read more

Why should you structure legacy fundraising content around pledger stories?

When it comes to legacy fundraising, the research is clear. Effective legacy content should be structured around the stories of your living pledgers.

Read more

Key fundraising insights for 2026

Blue State are back with their Giving Behaviours Tracker. This time they asked 2,010 people in the UK about their giving habits – including what motivates them to give and what holds them back. Click to read an overview, then down­load the full report to explore the data further.

Read more

Also in Categories