Mak­ing can­cer cute

The ad agency has struck again with this strik­ing­ly stu­pid non­prof­it ad.

Written by
Jeff Brooks
Added
May 14, 2014

The victim: Movember (the organisation that challenges men to change their appearance and the face of men’s health by growing a moustache in November). The offending agency: the slash-challenged TBWA\Chiat|Day.

Now I can see the power in giving people the opportunity to beat up a terrible disease; there are certainly a couple of diseases that I wish I could kick to pieces. But when you symbolise that by making the kickers look like homophobic thugs and the disease look like a cute team mascot, well, you’ve turned the concept upside do

I actually wonder if the creators of this advert even watched it. Didn’t anyone raise their hand and say ‘Umm…it looks like we’re kicking Mickey Mouse’s butt’. Of course not. The ad agency geniuses were wrapped in their usual world of abstraction. In all their creativity, they missed the central fact that prostate cancer is a terrible thing. It’s not a cute and goofy costume. It is a real life disease that hurts and can be fatal.

If you want to move people to fight prostate cancer show them there is a problem, make that problem real and give them a meaningful action they can take. Finally show how their actions will help to make progress against the disease.

Abstract symbolism doesn’t achieve any of that.

Shockingly, this video was not the only offending ad for this campaign. 


Really? Prostate cancer is picking up prostitutes? That’s what has our thug-protagonists all worked up?

I am amazed at how this ad agency has worked for this charity. They started off badly with a pointless, dumb and misdirected abstract concept. And then they managed to get surreally worse.

So remember the standard warning for when an ad agency comes up with a clever, conceptual and intangible idea to represent your cause: just say no!

About the author: Jeff Brooks

Jeff Brooks has served the nonprofit community for more than 30 years, working as a writer and creative director on behalf of a variety of organisations including CARE, World Vision, Feeding America, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, National Wildlife Federation, and many more. He blogs at Future Fundraising Now and Moceanic. In previous careers, he’s been an English teacher and a classical musician. He lives in Seattle in the USA.

Recent Articles

From the Myth Smashers: We can’t ask new patients to donate, or can we?

Saarah Abdeen discusses the assumption that fundraisers shouldn’t ask new patients to donate. Keep reading and discover the personal experiences that got Saarah thinking about how and why we should finally smash this myth.

Read more

Open Letter to Tom Ralser re: The fallacy of ‘facts tell, stories sell’

Claire Axelrad responds to Tom Ralser’s opinion piece with an open letter. In it, Claire shares her perspective on storytelling, as a writer and fundraiser.

Read more

Matched funding challenge boosts Ken Burnett’s latest 500-mile quest

Thanks to the kindness and generosity of Chip Grizzard, the first £7,500 Ken raises will now be doubled! Could you help Ken reach his goal and raise even more for SOFII?

Read more

The fallacy of ‘facts tell, stories sell’

In a new addition to SOFII’s Opinions and Debates showcase, Tom Ralser shares his view on the notion that ‘facts tell, stories sell’. When it comes to fundraising, Tom feels that relying on stories alone isn’t always enough to create a great appeal AND convince your donor to give. 

Read more

Can fundraisers tell the difference between AI and human-written thank you letters?

Surprising survey results show that AI letters were rated higher by fundraisers than human-written letters. 

Read more

Also in Categories