Stu­pid mis­con­cep­tion about the inner lives of children

Hey, I have a great idea for a fundrais­ing campaign.

Written by
Jeff Brooks
Added
May 14, 2013

Here’s the brief:

  • Even though it’s about suffering children, don’t show any children. (Nobody is emotionally connected to children anymore, right?)
  • The centrepiece will be a series of images that most people will not be able to identify. (That’ll make them pay more attention, right?)
  • Explain the image with a slogan that completely undercuts the cause. (Cognitive dissonance!)

Okay, not such a good idea. But it seems to be the brief for this campaign for War Child in the UK. Here’s one of the ads:

There are several other print ads (or posters?) in the campaign and even a video on YouTube, none of which sheds any more light on the message:

It’s easy to convince children that killing is a game.

Think about that slogan for a moment. If you know any children, the falsity of it is breathtaking. In fact, the monsters who create child soldiers don’t lure them in with fun and games – they do it with appalling violence and drugs. They psychologically destroy the child to turn him into a killer.

And if it were true that it’s easy to convince children that killing is a game, saying so would be an ineffective way to arouse the empathy of potential donors. Apparently, in the alternate universe where this ad agency is located, children are just one step away from being war criminals.

Like most stupid nonprofit ads, the whole premise is an insanely ill-conceived visual metaphor. You probably didn’t realise those things on the posters were weapons made from balloons much less the point they’re trying to make.

Thanks to Creative Advertisements for NGOs for the tip.

About the author: Jeff Brooks

Jeff Brooks has served the nonprofit community for more than 30 years, working as a writer and creative director on behalf of a variety of organisations including CARE, World Vision, Feeding America, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, National Wildlife Federation, and many more. He blogs at Future Fundraising Now and Moceanic. In previous careers, he’s been an English teacher and a classical musician. He lives in Seattle in the USA.

Recent Articles

Open Letter to Tom Ralser re: The fallacy of ‘facts tell, stories sell’

Claire Axelrad responds to Tom Ralser’s opinion piece with an open letter. In it, Claire shares her perspective on storytelling, as a writer and fundraiser.

Read more

Matched funding challenge boosts Ken Burnett’s latest 500-mile quest

Thanks to the kindness and generosity of Chip Grizzard, the first £7,500 Ken raises will now be doubled! Could you help Ken reach his goal and raise even more for SOFII?

Read more

The fallacy of ‘facts tell, stories sell’

In a new addition to SOFII’s Opinions and Debates showcase, Tom Ralser shares his view on the notion that ‘facts tell, stories sell’. When it comes to fundraising, Tom feels that relying on stories alone isn’t always enough to create a great appeal AND convince your donor to give. 

Read more

Can fundraisers tell the difference between AI and human-written thank you letters?

Surprising survey results show that AI letters were rated higher by fundraisers than human-written letters. 

Read more

A medida que los donantes jóvenes empiezan a participar más, ¿están las organizaciones preparadas para ellos?

Las personas jóvenes están listas para apoyar a las organizaciones, pero la forma en la que te comunicas con ellas puede marcar una gran diferencia en que elijan o no tu causa. En este artículo, Anjali Bewtra de Blue State, comparte qué tomar en cuenta al comunicarse con este público, junto con ejemplos de entidades que ya lo están haciendo bien.

Read more

Also in Categories