This ad accus­es repres­sive gov­ern­ments of absent-mindedness

Anoth­er bad ad from Jeff Brooks that asks: why resort to abstrac­tion when the truth itself is so powerful?

Written by
Jeff Brooks
Added
May 14, 2013

Another nonprofit tries to spread the word through inept abstraction.

You probably know that in many parts of the world it’s dangerous to be a journalist. In the places where the light of news reporting is most needed, reporters are at best kept from doing their work ­– and at worst being jailed, tortured, even killed.

I think that’s a pretty urgent situation. It’s a story – especially when you get to the specifics – that could get people to rally around with donations. Don’t you agree?

Apparently Reporters Without Borders (or their ad agency partners) don’t agree. They’ve decided to tell the story through an abstract metaphor.

Check it out:

Let’s analyse this: many people absent-mindedly chew on the ends of their pens. Pens become ugly as a result. This is somehow analogous to the violence and repression suffered by journalists? Some countries gnaw on journalists’ heads while they’re thinking about something else?

The metaphor is not only abstract, it’s inept. Repression of journalists is highly purposeful, the acts of evil and corrupt governments that know they’re better off in the dark. It's not a preoccupied compulsion.

One of the ads in this series comes perilously close to working. It’s the version with the red pen, where the ink looks enough like blood to call to mind the violence journalists face.

Well, it almost works.

Just remember: beware the ad agencies. They’ll do work like this for you. Though, as a recent commenter pointed out, it’s your own fault if it happens; the ad agencies can’t force nonprofits to look stupid.

Thanks to Osocio for the tip.

About the author: Jeff Brooks

Jeff Brooks has served the nonprofit community for more than 30 years, working as a writer and creative director on behalf of a variety of organisations including CARE, World Vision, Feeding America, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, National Wildlife Federation, and many more. He blogs at Future Fundraising Now and Moceanic. In previous careers, he’s been an English teacher and a classical musician. He lives in Seattle in the USA.

Recent Articles

Open Letter to Tom Ralser re: The fallacy of ‘facts tell, stories sell’

Claire Axelrad responds to Tom Ralser’s opinion piece with an open letter. In it, Claire shares her perspective on storytelling, as a writer and fundraiser.

Read more

Matched funding challenge boosts Ken Burnett’s latest 500-mile quest

Thanks to the kindness and generosity of Chip Grizzard, the first £7,500 Ken raises will now be doubled! Could you help Ken reach his goal and raise even more for SOFII?

Read more

The fallacy of ‘facts tell, stories sell’

In a new addition to SOFII’s Opinions and Debates showcase, Tom Ralser shares his view on the notion that ‘facts tell, stories sell’. When it comes to fundraising, Tom feels that relying on stories alone isn’t always enough to create a great appeal AND convince your donor to give. 

Read more

Can fundraisers tell the difference between AI and human-written thank you letters?

Surprising survey results show that AI letters were rated higher by fundraisers than human-written letters. 

Read more

A medida que los donantes jóvenes empiezan a participar más, ¿están las organizaciones preparadas para ellos?

Las personas jóvenes están listas para apoyar a las organizaciones, pero la forma en la que te comunicas con ellas puede marcar una gran diferencia en que elijan o no tu causa. En este artículo, Anjali Bewtra de Blue State, comparte qué tomar en cuenta al comunicarse con este público, junto con ejemplos de entidades que ya lo están haciendo bien.

Read more

Also in Categories