Vio­lent video explodes nonprofit’s reputation

Jeff Brooks iden­ti­fies not just a bad advert but, in his view, an evil one. He argues that this aber­ra­tion has done last­ing dam­age to the charity’s cause and rep­u­ta­tion. Agree or dis­agree – what do you think?

Written by
Jeff Brooks
Added
May 14, 2013

A number of people have asked if I planned to feature this short film produced for climate change charity 10:10 in this bad nonprofit ad showcase.

While I have decided to include it, I’m not going to label it as stupid. This is worse: this is evil. As I hope never to encounter anything as reprehensible as this ever again, I hope it won’t become a new series.

Watch the ad. Though, I can’t recommend it and, if you do, you’re likely to feel a little ill afterwards.


Apparently it was meant to be funny and amusing – a jokey, light-hearted fantasy about reducing people who don’t agree with you (including children) to splatters of bloody pulp. Hilarious.

To their credit, the 10:10 campaign has withdrawn this film. But you just have to ask how did this happen? How did something so vile get approved?

While I have no insider-knowledge, I’ll hazard a guess. Was it because it was made by famous Hollywood professionals (the film was directed by well-known director Richard Curtis and features a cast including film star Gillian Anderson and England footballer Peter Crouch)? And just as charities are sometimes blinded by the glamour of ad agencies into doing adverts that shouldn’t really exist, the glitz and glamour of Hollywood must have made their brains turn off so they accepted and signed-off this awful video.

In this case, the result of being dazzled was even worse than it is when ad agencies create stupid, wasteful messages.

Sometimes Hollywood films are so violent and thuggishly vicious you get the feeling you're looking straight into some kind of demonic heart of darkness. Many make the claim that it's all just a joke. This film has that same feeling.

It doesn’t even make a case for reducing your carbon footprint. It just says people who don’t get it deserve violent summary executions at the hands of low-level bureaucrats. After I saw it, I had a strong urge to drive my car more than usual and cut down some trees – anything to dissociate myself from the wickedness.

This film has made 10:10, no doubt a well-meaning and good-hearted nonprofit organisation, look like a pack of psychos. They’ve handed the climate change sceptics a perfect reason to claim that environmentalists are anti-human extremists. They've done lasting, maybe irreparable, damage to their own reputation and to their cause in general.

Please don’t let it happen to you. If someone cool and famous offers you something, you still need to think carefully and critically about what he will do and what it will achieve. It might not necessarily be good. And it could be the worst thing that ever happens to you.

About the author: Jeff Brooks

Jeff Brooks has served the nonprofit community for more than 30 years, working as a writer and creative director on behalf of a variety of organisations including CARE, World Vision, Feeding America, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, National Wildlife Federation, and many more. He blogs at Future Fundraising Now and Moceanic. In previous careers, he’s been an English teacher and a classical musician. He lives in Seattle in the USA.

Recent Articles

A softer year for giving – but four donor groups show us where there’s growth potential

Every year, Blue State releases their Giv­ing Behav­iours Track­er. In this article, Anjali Bewtra explains that the latest findings show the UK public is still profoundly generous, but increasingly selective about their donations. 

Read more

Diversificar ingresos: Más allá de los proyectos y donantes

Diversificar fondos o ingresos no significa simplemente buscar más donantes; eso solo perpetúa la lógica de financiamiento basada en proyectos. La verdadera diversificación implica ir más allá y construir un modelo que integre otras fuentes de ingresos además de los proyectos, como programas e ingresos propios o unidades de negocio. 

Read more

El sourcing en la cooperación: cómo ser una organización local visible y atractiva para financiadores

En la cooperación internacional y la filantropía, solemos pensar que son las organizaciones sociales las que buscan y compiten por acceder a fondos. Sin embargo, cada vez más, el proceso funciona en doble vía: los financiadores también hacen sourcing, es decir, buscan activamente socios locales sólidos, confiables y con capacidad de generar impacto real en los territorios o comunidades.  

Read more

¿Qué es un agente fiscal y cuándo usarlo en la canalización de fondos de cooperación internacional?

A pesar de los cambios recientes, la cooperación internacional sigue movilizando cada año millones de dólares destinados a financiar proyectos de desarrollo, acción humanitaria y fortalecimiento institucional en todo el mundo. Sin embargo, muchas veces los recursos no llegan de manera directa a las organizaciones locales que implementan las iniciativas. Una de las figuras más utilizadas para canalizar estos fondos es la del agente fiscal (fiscal agent o fiscal sponsor en inglés). 

Read more

How to fix the donation page your supporter can’t use

Accessibility affects supporter experience, particularly when it comes to giving. In this article, you’ll discover some top tips for how fundraisers can spot accessibility problems and fix them too. 

Read more

Also in Categories